Torreya Taxifolia tree decline and migration
The decline of the Torreya in the florida is not known to full. In order to thrive it again the passage provides three different solution. however, the solution will be less likely viable what the lecture said.
The first contradictory solution is planting the endenger species in the micro climate where it have been thrive from the past thousands year. The lecture however says that it is not possible as the micro cliamte tends to fluctuate if change in larger cliamte. Increasing global warming and draining of the wet land of the florida cause vary change in the micro climate of the torreya where it once thrived profusely.
Another problem for the solution that assited migration may have unpredictable consequences. past paragon of assisted migration of the black locust in the norther part of the florida shows that it may have undigested results; at that time, it may have thrive but it shifted many native plant species of that area region which was endengered.
The thrid solution of research centre to rehabilate the torreya unlikely be complete solution of the problem. To profilate the species, diesease resistant nature of it is must. however, this condition is only possible when it has more diversity and the more space to grow. Due to the limited space of the research center, tyhe abilty of resistance rarely within the plant grows inside it.
In conclusion, each solution in the passage hardly address the problem of impending torreya extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...sage provides three different solution. however, the solution will be less likely viabl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...r species in the micro climate where it have been thrive from the past thousands yea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thrived', 'thriven'.
Suggestion: thrived; thriven
...in the micro climate where it have been thrive from the past thousands year. The lectu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'thousands'' or 'thousand's'?
Suggestion: thousands'; thousand's
...where it have been thrive from the past thousands year. The lecture however says that it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Past
...on may have unpredictable consequences. past paragon of assisted migration of the bl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'thrived', 'thriven'.
Suggestion: thrived; thriven
...sted results; at that time, it may have thrive but it shifted many native plant specie...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...iesease resistant nature of it is must. however, this condition is only possible when i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dition is only possible when it has more diversity and the more space to grow. Du...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04918032787 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5559317059 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8400936058 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7692307692 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113789106179 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442301755318 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06790751528 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631805645452 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287766757818 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.