In this passage author proposing that employee have option to opt if they want to work four days in a week instead of five days in a week with little low salary i.e 80 % of five days of working employee.
Author mentioned here that if the employee work for four days in a week it will be beneficial to company because they need to pay lesser to employees for same amount of work but in lecture professor is contradict with this statement as working four days in a week pursue more costly to company as the medical and other benefits need to provide same without respective of five days working or four days working employee. In addition, company need to hire more people for extra work and have to pay them as well all benefits. So four days working may lead to company to spend more cost to employees.
Secondly, author mentioned in paragraph four days working employee may create more opportunity of employment as employer can hire more resources who also interesting to work four days a week in 80% of salary. The lecturer is not agree with this statement as mentioned in early paragraph as well it will not be cost effective for employer as they need to pay medical and other benefits also to additional resources so they will be end up with extra cost. So, Instead of hiring new resources company may expect current employees to work overtime in same amount of salary to complete their assigned task.
Third, In paragraph author mentioned the employees working for four days in week they can spend quality of time with their family, but it is not convincing to lecturer as it may lead employee life more worst and irksome. employee working for four days may be in the top list of firing if the economical breakdown happens. They will not get promoted as company prefer full time employee for managerial position, because they want some one who can take hold on other employee for all five days in a week.
In Conclusion lecturer won't be satisfy with the proposal of author of working four days in a week with low salary.
Line 4 : pay lesser ---> pay
Line 4 : pay lesser ---> pay less : less is comparative adjective itself
Line 4 : in lecture professor : use comma between lecture and professor and also "the" before lecture and professor
Line 4 : is contradict how you used is + verb ? contradict is not adj.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...unt of work but in lecture professor is contradict with this statement as working four day...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...k in 80% of salary. The lecturer is not agree with this statement as mentioned in ear...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: worst
...o lecturer as it may lead employee life more worst and irksome. employee working for four ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employee
...d employee life more worst and irksome. employee working for four days may be in the top...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...will not get promoted as company prefer full time employee for managerial position, becau...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... managerial position, because they want some one who can take hold on other employee for...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'in addition', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256544502618 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.15445026178 0.158904122519 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0994764397906 0.0723426182421 138% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418848167539 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0366492146597 0.0277247811725 132% => OK
Prepositions: 0.164921465969 0.128828473217 128% => OK
Participles: 0.0471204188482 0.0370669169778 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41327663517 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0471204188482 0.0208969081088 225% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00261780104712 0.00154638098197 169% => OK
Determiners: 0.0523560209424 0.128158765124 41% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0314136125654 0.0158828679856 198% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00523560209424 0.0114777025283 46% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2033.0 1645.83664459 124% => OK
No of words: 364.0 271.125827815 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58516483516 6.08160592843 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.302197802198 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244505494505 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159340659341 0.187439937562 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101648351648 0.113142543107 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41327663517 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387362637363 0.539623497131 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.5440700646 53.8517498576 73% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0909090909 21.7502111507 152% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.0798252327 49.3711431718 187% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.818181818 132.220823453 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0909090909 21.7502111507 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 57.5414585415 50.5018328374 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.01123595506 1.90840788429 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493589538425 0.549887131256 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.203584746517 0.142949733639 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114126558787 0.0787303798458 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.713146523049 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171031763127 0.139662658121 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261554775787 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712421155471 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.453843664246 0.414875509568 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100150462999 0.0530846634433 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343275951564 0.40443939384 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750965457315 0.0528353158467 142% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.