Having revised botf of the sources, both the passege and the lecture discuss that employees work four-day a week. While the reading passage mainly focused about its avantages, the listening passage gives its dezavantages.
First the passage says that it could rise the componies incoming as employees could take some rest and alert, as a result of this companies could get more job and money. The listening passage, however, says that this idea could force companies spend more money because of taking more employees. They should spend more for education. And also the necesiaty of office and computer would be increased.
Second, unlike the reading passage, the listening passage says that hiring morestaff would be costly. The expectation would be so high and the job which should be done by five days would work four days thanks to this employees would be more tired. The lecture, on the other hand, does not take this view of 80 percent of rate will decrease.
Finally the listening passage says that employees would have more time which could cause some risk that quality of life could be decreased. Their career could be in danger and the reason of economy they could loose their job. The passage, however, feels that the idea could be better for individual employees. Employees could spend more time for their families or they could find new activities such as sport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ake some rest and alert, as a result of this companies could get more job and money....
^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ive days would work four days thanks to this employees would be more tired. The lect...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...w of 80 percent of rate will decrease. Finally the listening passage says that employe...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...er and the reason of economy they could loose their job. The passage, however, feels ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 5.04856512141 396% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96536796537 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28599303036 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528138528139 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5206374655 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2307692308 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461264174965 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162575926964 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096842815356 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272751404102 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967792992614 0.0443174109184 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.