The reading and the lecture both discuss the consequences of teamwork but, contrast each other. The reading that teamwork increases the productivity of individuals and follows creative solutions, whereas, the lecture refutes the ideas of teamwork on the reading and thinks that teamwork is less practical.
First of all, the reading states that the advantage of teamwork is a wider range of knowledge, skills, expertise brought into the situation. But, the profession argues that in the team, not everyone works the same, but all the members are appreciated for the results. So, Individuals who worked hard do not get a proper appreciation or credit.
Secondly, the reading states that teamwork helps to come up with creative solutions for problems and each and everyone is responsible for each right of wrong decisions. But, the professor's response to this matter was not positive as he thinks that it took time to make a decision and sometimes, one part of members influence others.
Finally, the reading states that individual team members have better opportunities to contribute to the team as a team's overall results are likely to have a greater impact than would have been accomplished by an individual. But, the lecturer disagrees with the reading as he believes that some member of the team intentionally influences others, ignoring a portion of team members and as a result, the overall result fails to provide expected output.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the effects of teamwork, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 60
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on repo 63
- GRE Argument:The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an ent 33
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 23
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...each right of wrong decisions. But, the professors response to this matter was not positiv...
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: A_PLURAL
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a team' or simply 'teams'?
Suggestion: a team; teams
...ortunities to contribute to the team as a teams overall results are likely to have a gr...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21374045802 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82024654448 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.085231995 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239556147067 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996478749059 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858218966302 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125034594472 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980292781722 0.0443174109184 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.