The reading and the listening passages are both about Rembrandt, who is a famous Dutch painter. While the reading passage suggests three reasons that one painting could not be a work by Rembrandt, the lecturer contends that it is done by him.
First of all, the author of the reading claims that there is something inconsistent about the drawing. It is mentioned that Rembrandt was known for his attention and would not do this problem. The professor, however, says that after they examine the painting with X-ray they found that fur color was not the original. Someone changed the colors to increase its value.
Secondly, the writer states that Rembrandt would never have made an error with his painting and in this painting, there is an issue with light and shadow, which it does not fit together. The professor cast doubt on this point by saying the original appeared to be fit. Also, she says because they modified the painting with fur colors the details seem to be changed.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that the painted was painted in a panel of several pieces of wood glutted together, which Rembrandt did not use. The lecturer, on the other hands, explains that the painting was enlarged after the fur colors in order to increase the cost. Also, she adds that the original was a single wood.
To conclude, the lecturer debunks all the points that were made in the reading.
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 85
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-millio 3
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-millio 3
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?A. riding bicycle or walking on footB. recycling the wasteC. buy local organic food. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85416666667 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31597336748 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9825559463 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471566397293 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153515903944 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114352777046 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235208580559 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112823293822 0.0443174109184 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.