The passage and the lecture mainly talked about if one painting belongs to Rembrandt. The author lists inconsistency of the clothing, light and shadow, and the back of the painting to verify that this painting doesn't belong to Rembrandt. While the professor indicates that these inconistencyinconsistency could be reasonable if considering the later correcting by other people.
To begin with, the woman's cloth is a fault which cannot be made by Rembrandt, such a considerate person to his subjects' clothing. In other words, the cloth has a style that only exist on the servants, but it has a unaffordable collar for servants. This pheminenonphenomenon can be explained by the ex-painting by other people. The reason why he/she do such thing is that he/she hope the piece seems more valuable.
Furtheormore, the above explanation also apt to the error of the light reflected by the collar. This dark fur collar should not reflect light onto the woman's face. However, if we remove the collar, we can find that in fact under this place a light collar exist. So it is natural and reasonable to the lightlifht reflecting on the face.
Besides, painted panel glued by various pieces of wood can also explained by this fact.
The later owner to do so is hoping increase the area so that make the painting more grade and valuable. And one other evidence is, the meterialmaterial of the wood that dreawed the piece is same with the maeterial of one other piece drew by Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e painting to verify that this painting doesnt belong to Rembrandt. While the professo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... only exist on the servants, but it has a unaffordable collar for servants. This ...
^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
... by other people. The reason why he/she do such thing is that he/she hope the piec...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'hopes'.
Suggestion: hopes
...why he/she do such thing is that he/she hope the piece seems more valuable. Furth...
^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...lued by various pieces of wood can also explained by this fact. The later owner to do so...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, while, in fact, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.928 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07629907519 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9758017036 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.0 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402590556437 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132027343856 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808598612225 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209382838911 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667333611056 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.