Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people may believe work three days a week is more enjoyable because they then have more whole pieces of time planning to relax themselves. However, despite of the big controlling power for people's own time, this also leave some problems so that I deem that working five days a week is more benefit and fun for workers.

For one thing, although some people maintain that they could have more choice when they work hard to exchange for a longer entertainment period after work day, such as have a short trip with their families, and they claim that it could be not occur if they work five days a week, they might be less accustomed to their job own to the practice time. More specifically, when they choose to play after their three working days, it is more possible that they forget certain new skills leaving for practice during working days. Take a memory monster as an example. This memory monster tell us that when you learn something new, you need to practice it constantly after the first few days. In this case, choose shorter working days in a week may cause you have less memory effect, even you try hard and pay same efforts in your jobs.

Secondly, I insist that an enjoyable job need to not only help workers play well after work, but also give workers a reasonably ideal and easy working environment. In fact, company wound not stop even workers do since employers always want to earn more in a short time. Thus, these bosses come up to hire other workers during your vocation. The chance is that those people may rob your working chance and finally affect your promoting. Moreover, after they have worked three days, you must help them finishing their left work. For example, Meituan, a prestigious food transport company, encourages its workers compete with each other. After somebody leave for vocation, other person will replenish the job of the former. Therefore, other person may rob your result, and you also need to accommodate the fierce environment. There is no enjoy when you work.

A risk to lose your working skills happened when only work three days, as illustrated from the word of a monster. Meanwhile, job could be plenty of pain as shown from the example of Meituan. Even work hard and enjoy a longer privacy time is sounds enjoyable, I believe the price is too high.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 501, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to finish' or 'finish'.
Suggestion: to finish; finish
...e worked three days, you must help them finishing their left work. For example, Meituan, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 651, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leaves'.
Suggestion: leaves
...compete with each other. After somebody leave for vocation, other person will repleni...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, such as, for one thing

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73086419753 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27941491569 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513580246914 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6613386606 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.842105263 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365809745774 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113595962019 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769860360883 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224552737682 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592036432698 0.0645574589148 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.