Both lecture and topic discuss about Remrant painting who is the famous painter in seventeen century.
Reading doubt whether some of painting really pain by Remrant because of some of problem, whereas lecture refute reading after examination.
Reading claimed that the painting by name of attribute to Remrant which painting of a women dressed luxurious is not refer to Remrant , because he was master of lighting and shadow but in painting the lighting and shadow was not much together , the women face in painting was illuminated by light but bellow face was dark and such error was not acceptable from Rembrant.
Also painting was on wood glued together that is this painting was removed from official catalog of Rembrant.
However the lecture refute reading by providing examination and by applying x-ray, light and color was applied to the Rembrant painting years after his painting might be some wanted to increase painting value.
In original painting the woman was with simple color dress and year after on top of painting light and shadow is applied which illuminate the woman face.
Also based on examination it shows that wood was applied on top of painting centuries after realistic because to increase value of painting.
To conclude the lecture refute reading passage by providing examination and x-ray .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... who is the famous painter in seventeen century. Reading doubt whether some of paintin...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
... attribute to Remrant which painting of a women dressed luxurious is not refer to Remra...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...ttribute to Remrant which painting of a women dressed luxurious is not refer to Remra...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'referred'.
Suggestion: referred
...ing of a women dressed luxurious is not refer to Remrant , because he was master of l...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ressed luxurious is not refer to Remrant , because he was master of lighting and s...
^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ighting and shadow was not much together , the women face in painting was illumina...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rror was not acceptable from Rembrant. Also painting was on wood glued together tha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... from official catalog of Rembrant. However the lecture refute reading by providing...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r on top of painting light and shadow is applied which illuminate the woman face....
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...plied which illuminate the woman face. Also based on examination it shows that wood...
^^^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...op of painting centuries after realistic because to increase value of painting. ...
^^
Line 10, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ssage by providing examination and x-ray .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, really, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20093457944 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48825737191 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485981308411 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.0708283915 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.125 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375101660967 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190121808368 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112889152678 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190121808368 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112889152678 0.0443174109184 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.