The article states that dinosaurs or more specifically polar dinosaurs used to be endotherm animals. They used to keep their body temperature constant. Reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that many scientists have problems with these claims. They do not think that they have proven these claims. The professor challenges each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in Polar Region. But the professor refutes this point by stating that research has revealed that the Polar Region used to be much warmer than today. Thus it was not necessary to be an endotherm so to be able to live there.
Second, the article claims that there is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs. However, the professor contends that the reason for the position of dinosaurs' legs which was under their body is a lot more likely for supporting more weight and so they could grow to large sizes which was beneficial.
Finally, the reading avers that there is a connection between endothermy and bone structure because the bones of endotherms usually include structures called Haversian canals. The professor acknowledges that dinosaurs bone structure has Haversian canals but he opposes the relationship by saying that the bone structure it also has growth rings. Growth rings are good evidence of dinosaurs not growing or slow growing times during cold periods. Indeed, endotherms must grow well even within cold seasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...gion used to be much warmer than today. Thus it was not necessary to be an endotherm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2868852459 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56645090542 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569672131148 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5999560825 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373451285461 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109083922328 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071776773911 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204262599955 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576529369563 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.