There was some discrepancy between the passage and lecture over the issue of evidences that show dinosaurs are Endotherm. The author of the passage said that dinosaurs are endotherms based on some evidences that the lecture disproves cause they don't provide enough proof.
Based on the passage, polar regions are cold and only endotherms can stay in that region; however, the lecture disagrees by saying that polar regions were warmer than recent times for even non-endotherms and the dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer areas. Therefore, the idea that endotherms can survive in cold regions isn't enough proof to say dinosaurs are endotherms.
In addition to the issues of cold regions, the lecture also disagrees with the concept made by the passage that endotherms have legs placed under their body ,dinosaurs are endotherms. It further explains that there could be another reason for dinosaurs having legs under their body and it could be as a means to support their more body size and weight and the lecture also explains that their running pattern isn't associated with the endothermian running.
Conclusively, the passage also states that the dinosaur's possession of a Harvesian canal blesses them with rapid growth rate and this is a major characteristic of an endotherm; however, the lecture opposes this fact by stating that the dinosaurs do have growth rings but they grow slower during cooler periods and this contrasts the fact that endotherms grow rapidly when the environment becomes cooler.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There was some discrepancy between the p...
^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s that the lecture disproves cause they dont provide enough proof. Based o...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cause they dont provide enough proof. Based on the passage, polar regions a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... endotherms can survive in cold regions isnt enough proof to say dinosaurs are endot...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proof to say dinosaurs are endotherms. In addition to the issues of cold reg...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...therms have legs placed under their body ,dinosaurs are endotherms. It further exp...
^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...lso explains that their running pattern isnt associated with the endothermian runnin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iated with the endothermian running. Conclusively, the passage also states th...
^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...ively, the passage also states that the dinosaurs possession of a Harvesian canal blesses...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24691358025 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58558724337 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.1701298614 49.2860985944 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.142857143 110.228320801 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7142857143 21.698381199 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347249923999 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171788959709 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341812175462 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202168838788 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267330900407 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.3589403974 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.