The article states that Dinosaurs were endotherms animals and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor refutes this suggestion and she says that there is some evidence proves that Dianasour wasn't endotherms.
First, the article claims that Dinasour Fossils have been discovered in polar regions and that proves of being endotherms. But, The professor argued that the Dinosaur was warm enough than today and it could be migrated to the polar region.
Second, The article posits that there is a connection between endothermy and the position of legs. the physiology of endotherms allows continuous physical activity such as running. But, the running is efficient only when the legs are located underneath its body as in Dinosaur. However, the professor says that the underneath legs are necessary for held such a huge body and that doesn't prove that Dinasour is endotherms.
Third, the article says that the Diansour Fossils Contain large amount of Haversion canals that house nerves and blood vessels to allow the living animals to grow rapidly. Even though, The professor opposes this point by explained that the Dinasour bones contain growth rings that's evidence of stopped growing or growing slowly and all of that reasons contract the argument of Dinosaur's endothermy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... is some evidence proves that Dianasour wasnt endotherms. First, the article claims ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...en endothermy and the position of legs. the physiology of endotherms allows continu...
^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sary for held such a huge body and that doesnt prove that Dinasour is endotherms. Thi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...the Dinasour bones contain growth rings thats evidence of stopped growing or growing ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32843137255 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48402721315 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0103645436 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378905520629 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141089551212 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547415572026 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211974580668 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741197606287 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.