TPO 05
The article states that archeologist trying to understand how settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico used their massive house. and provide 3 theories of usage of the houses. However, the professor claims that their evidence is not convincing and refutes each author's reasons
First, the reading states that the houses were purely residential with each housing contains one hundreds of people. The professor refutes this point by claiming that outside the houses were similar to the Taos but inside of it cast doubts the idea since there were not many fireplaces for cooking. Even for the largest house, the fireplaces were sufficient for 10 families. However, 500 families could live in this house.
Second, the article states claims that people stored maize in their house. However, the professor contends that it could sound plausible, but there not many traces of maize in the house. If they used the house for storing maize, there should be enough spoiled maize on the ground.
Third, the reading avers that researchers found broken pots in a mund close to the one of the Chaco Canyon house, and it shows they used houses for ceremonies. The lecturer opposite this point by stating that there were lots of other material in the mound include building and construction material. it shows that they piles were used for wasted material rather than merely broken pots
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...in New Mexico used their massive house. and provide 3 theories of usage of the hous...
^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vincing and refutes each authors reasons First, the reading states that the house...
^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'one hundred'
Suggestion: one hundred
... residential with each housing contains one hundreds of people. The professor refutes this p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one hundred', 'a hundred', or simply 'hundreds'?
Suggestion: one hundred; a hundred; hundreds
... residential with each housing contains one hundreds of people. The professor refutes this p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'one hundred'.
Suggestion: one hundred
... residential with each housing contains one hundreds of people. The professor refutes this poin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere sufficient for 10 families. However, 500 families could live in this house. ...
^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ude building and construction material. it shows that they piles were used for was...
^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'pile'
Suggestion: pile
...nstruction material. it shows that they piles were used for wasted material rather th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3188775264 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4573043082 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352540746802 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126920342025 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049470833106 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204194933553 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474055493175 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.