TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin

Both the author of the reading and the speaker discuss how American adapt to the issue of certification wood companies from different perspectives. The speaker negates all the ideas mentioned in the article.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that American consumers do not believe advertising, so they also do not pay attention to the eco - certification label. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that American consumers do not react the same for all advertising. Actually, they are confident in eco-certification.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that eco-certification wood is more expensive than uncertified wood. Therefore, American consumers tend to choose cheaper products. The speaker rebuts this argument by saying that every people cares about the cost of products, so do American. However, American not only concern about the price. Hence, they choose to use eco- certification in order to protect the environment.
Finally, the author of the reading states that American wood companies only sale their products in the U.S. Therefore, they do not pay attention to international products. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by saying that American companies do pay attention to international products for competition because if they have lower cost, people will by their products.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39252336449 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08752440033 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.511368169 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7692307692 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4615384615 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409954940748 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14696595594 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948356875425 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258002004852 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919506492407 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.