The reading passage suggests some events in memoir of Chevalier may invented or distorted and provides three pieces of evidence. However, the professor refutes each idea of the author.
First and foremost, the reading states that researchers found that he borrowed money from the merchant however he wrote that he was healthy and spend considerably of it in parties when he was in Switzerland. On the other hand, the lecturer argued that he borrowed it until he got his own money because it took a few days to convert money.
Secondly, the passage indicates the impossibility of the conversation between famous writer Voltaire and Chevalier written in the memoir. Thus, it is impossible to remember all the words and phrases which sustain the idea that Chevalier may invent it. In contrast, the professor said that witnesses said that he tries to remember all the words every night and also always brought a journal with himself.
Thirdly and finally, the article claims the story of how the Chevalier escape from the prison using metal to make a hole and climb into the wall of Venice could be false because the friends of Chevalier may release him from there who politically related him well. Nonetheless, the lecturer made a counterclaim to the idea by saying that there are also prisoners who have friends but they are not free in that time. Moreover, she continued that there is a document about how to repair the prison room which is related to the Chevalier.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.564 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1094153611 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4 7.06452816374 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376202938443 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123287399638 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742660889853 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186604272734 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237648371915 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.