TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss a fascinating topic pertaining to the hydrogen-based fuel cell engine instead of the internal-combustion engine for the automobiles. The author of the passage presents three main advantages of the hydrogen-based engine. The lecturer casts serious doubt on the claims made in the article. She says that all these ideas are not beneficial.
First of all, the reading article posits that hydrogen-based engine does not rely on petroleum which is a finite resource. He claims that there are various sources from which hydrogen can be produced like from water or from natural gas. This point is challenged by the professor. She says that hydrogen can not be easily made by water or from the natural gas. furthermore, she acknowledges that pure hydrogen is a liquid state which must need very low temperature. Hence, high technology needs to produce the hydrogen.
Secondly, the author of the passage argues that hydrogen-based fuel cells reduce the pollution problems because the byproduct of this kind of engine is water, which is not harmful to the environment. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. She says that the process of making pure hydrogen causes pollution. She elaborates on this by mentioning that hydrogen from natural gas contains a process of burning coal and oil, which causes the pollution. Therefore, she says that hydrogen engine cars may not pollute the environment but the generator for the cars causes the pollution.
Finally, the reading article discusses that hydrogen-based engines reduce the cost of money. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions that the cost of making the hydrogen is very high. She puts forth to the idea that engine contains radium which is a rare element so the price is very high.
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO 24 Integrated Writing Task 52
- TPO 12 Integrated Writing Task 72
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...dvantages of the hydrogen-based engine. The lecturer casts serious doubt on the cla...
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
... made by water or from the natural gas. furthermore, she acknowledges that pure hydrogen is...
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...rare element so the price is very high.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13698630137 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87246914721 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489726027397 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3831622341 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3333333333 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31303580893 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949030866579 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093880647421 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194406673118 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059897044171 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.