The reading states that the explanation for the reduction of the sea otter is the pollution theory and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecture explains that the pollution thesis is weakened and the best interpretation for this case is the predation theory and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the chemical remains in the ocean's water could be the cause for these creatures to die and decrease in numbers. However, the lecturer counters this point by saying that there were no dead bodies on the coast to support the pollution assumption. So the predators would be more logic explanation.
Secondly, the article mentions that the decrease of other species like seals and sea lions asserts the pollution hypothesis since that would affect the whole animals. However, the professor opposes this point by mentioning that predators like orca whales could attack these animals because of the declination of her normal preys.
Thirdly, the reading states that the different level of pollution could explain the different pattern in sea otter declination. While the professor rejects this claim by saying that the uneven pattern is more likely to confirm the predation theory. She clarifies that the region that has more groups of these animals where the water is shallow and the predators due to their large size could not reach to coast to feed on sea otter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erent pattern in sea otter declination. While the professor rejects this claim by say...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07296137339 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46388566312 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527896995708 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2889790432 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300198519627 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113554202347 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552890982306 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174903233358 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477148075445 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.