TPO 10 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

TPO 10: Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

The article states that wood companies in the US won’t make ecocertification and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that most of the companies in US are going into that field and refutes all of the author’s reasons.

First, the reading claims that American consumers are exposed to so much advertising so they won’t pay attention to the ecocertification. The professor refutes this point by saying that not all advertising are the same in there.

Secondly, the article posits that ecocertified wood will be more expensive because it needs to pay a lot to earn ecocertification and that American consumers tend to be strongly motivated by the price. The professor actually agrees with that but he states that price isn’t the only factor that motivate people especially if the difference is an increase only by 5 precent.

Finally, the reading says that doesn’t agree that keeping up with the development will make good business for American companies. The professor oppose this point by explain that this statement is true and it’s not about keeping up with the development but it’s about competition, because if the market in the US is falling behind foreign companies will take advantage of that and they will lose so much in their business.
In conclusion, the article seems to oppose the ecocertification but the professor thinks that the statement is true.

Votes
Average: 0.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...S are going into that field and refutes all of the author’s reasons. First, the reading...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...s for American companies. The professor oppose this point by explain that this stateme...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19650655022 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96657324471 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510917030568 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2245546607 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.222222222 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919221383995 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368163401467 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311426994828 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0456602829039 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355052254263 0.0443174109184 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.