TPO 12 Integrated

Essay topics:

TPO 12 Integrated

The professor explains three arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the authenticity of portrait which is believed belong to Jane Austen.

First, the professor argues Austen was dead when she was 70 years old. So, her family member could not have to seen her. Although the reading passage states that Austen's family gave permission in order to use the portrait as paint, the professor repudiates this idea based on aforementioned explanations.

Second, it is mentioned in the reading passage that the portrait is highly similar in every details to the sketch which had been painted by her sister Cassandra. In contrast, the professor draws attention to the idea that Austen's family which was very large and they could have a lot of Jane Austen or girls in similar age in the family. So, the professor rejects this idea by giving an alternative hypothesis which makes the reading's idea dubious.

Third and last, the reading passage asserts that there is evidence indicates that the portrait had been painted when Austen was a teenager. Although the painting has not any signature in order to determine time and creator of it, evidence demonstrates that the style of painting is very similar to Ozias Humphery, who would hired by Austen's family, and was active when Jane was the age of the girl in the painting. On the contrary, the professor disproves the idea by pointing the stamp which is on the back of the painting canvas. As he staes, the canvas was sold by the man, who started his business in painting 27 years after Jane's teenager and Humphery's active period of time.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-10-10 MRoy 75 Read full essay
2017-04-11 arti chauhan 72 Read full essay
2017-04-10 hipax 80 Read full essay
2016-05-21 milad.hf 60 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Jane seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of (Jane)'.
Suggestion: a lot of (Jane)
...hich was very large and they could have a lot of Jane Austen or girls in similar age in the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
... alternative hypothesis which makes the readings idea dubious. Third and last, the re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 666, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ter Janes teenager and Humpherys active period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, then, third, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91208791209 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50619059371 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6436760489 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431160335509 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173631807664 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092965564579 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279921518944 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565668521739 0.0443174109184 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.