TPO 13
The lecture and the passage are disscussing about private fossil collectors. The author of the article feels that sale of fossils and private collection have negative consequences which is unfoavorable for both scientist and general public. However, the profeesor feels these critiques are exaggerating the situation; althogh she accepts some possible adverse effects of private collecting, she is of the opinion that advantages are greater that disadvantages.
First the author is concerning about the fossils exposure to general public. The passage claims that if fossils do not donate to the museums then public would be deprived to see fossils. On the other hand, the lecturer insists that this not true and many schools and private museusms are buying these fossils and as a consequens the possibility for general public will be rised to visit the fossils
Secondly, the text writer is concerned about scientific investigations on discovered fossils since these discovered fossils are good resources for scientists to develope their experiments and researches. Nevertheless, the lecturer is far opposing this idea owing to this fact that scientis are playing important role in private collections are fossil market. The scientist are the ones who are initialy exposed to the recently dscovered fossils in order to dignose the geniunity and to give a price on them.
Finally, the writer is concerend about the technique used in extracting the fossils and missin many little fossils in commercial fossil collectors path. The lecturer accepts this flaw in their technique but she feels that their addventages are far more than disadvantages since they provide more materials to de discovered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... is unfoavorable for both scientist and general public. However, the profeesor feels these cri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...at disadvantages. First the author is concerning about the fossils exposure to general p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fossils'' or 'fossil's'?
Suggestion: fossils'; fossil's
...irst the author is concerning about the fossils exposure to general public. The passage...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...oncerning about the fossils exposure to general public. The passage claims that if fossils do ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...and as a consequens the possibility for general public will be rised to visit the fossils ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 374, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ctions are fossil market. The scientist are the ones who are initialy exposed to th...
^^^
Line 9, column 387, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ssil market. The scientist are the ones who are initialy exposed to the recently dscove...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48863636364 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85629168746 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.4826721912 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.9 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489910217122 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206842725972 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11120718513 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306137867593 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694880162573 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.