TPO 13- Buying and selling fossils
The text discusses that nowadays scarse and importants fossils are being sold to private ownerships for millions of dollars and in this situation scientists cannot examine the fossils. Also, public can not visit these fantastic fossils because they are not available in public places like museums. The reading says that buying fossils by reach people can have bad consequences and provides three reasons to support that. In contrast, the professor rejects all the mentioned reasons and explains the advantages are more and the passage's reasons are not convincing.
First, the reading states that private ownerships buy these fossils and in this condition other institutes like low level public schools can not have these valuable fossils. However, the professor rebuts this by stating that low level schools can buy these fossils as a teams and in this way people can have access to visit them in public places.
Second, the text asserts that if collectors have all these fossils scientists cannot examine these fossils. However, the lecture rejects this idea by describing that to put a value on a fossil a scientist must analyze the fossil completely. So, the scientist can obtain a lot of information about these remains and also collectors can have their fossils.
Third, the reading contends that most of the time commercial fossil collectors destroy precious documents related to these fossils because they are not professional people and they are just some ordinary people who are interested in collecting things! However, the professor states that these rich people excavate areas for finding fossils and these amount of excavations are not possible to do by universities. So, it is better to us to have many fossils instead of having few of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is better to us to have many fossils instead of having few of them.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19366197183 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56503148722 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496478873239 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7918873431 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437238267393 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190292758626 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072814986196 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291899087069 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035543764561 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.