Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, workes play a vital role in social development and progress. In my opinion, in somehow workers are the backbone of the nation and their satisfaction is necessary for having a developed country. Some people contend that workers by having many various types of task are more satisfied, while others assert that when the workers or employees do the similar task are satisfied more. Both of the opposing arguments appear to be somewhat convincing. However, my personal experience and actual observation of life agree that having a routine task all day long makes workers more satisfied in comparison with having a lot of different works to do. In the ensuing lines, I delve into two lines to substantiate my point.
First, in most of the cases, such as companies, factories, and other industrial buildings the worker's duty is hard and challenging. So, I think workers must be specialized in their unique task rather than doing a lot of different things. I think being an expert in one field makes them satisfied in comparison with doing many works on a moderate level. For example, I work in a company as a researcher. I work on a specific scientific issue and recently I published an article. My focus is on my own work. But, one time my supervisor put many tasks on me, and that was awful. I became dizzy and I don't have any idea of what task must be done first. As you can see, having one task and being an expert on that is more satisfying.
Second, if we put just one task on our workers, they will be experts in their work as I said before. Being an expert in their duties makes the company improved. For instance, my father works as a worker for an oil company. The company trained all of the workers of the company in their own fields. After six months, the company obtained many advantages effects. The amount of oil the company extracted increased. These effects gained just because the workers have only one task to focus on that.
In a nutshell, having just one duty makes the worker more satisfied because of two reasons. In summary, by having one task to do they become an expert in their jobs. Also, being an expert in their work causes the company or factory progress. So, it leads to more salary for workers and it is satisfying. I hope workers can be satisfied because they have a key role in having a successful and improvement country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ies, and other industrial buildings the workers duty is hard and challenging. So, I thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd that was awful. I became dizzy and I dont have any idea of what task must be done...
^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...for an oil company. The company trained all of the workers of the company in their own fie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...leads to more salary for workers and it is satisfying. I hope workers can be satisfied becaus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6170212766 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56346327083 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472813238771 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.532025648 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.3333333333 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295267422782 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792734865715 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911327683836 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202183056812 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756029004278 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.