TPO-14
The reading and the lecture are both about "salvage logging". The professor in the lecture totally disagrees with the three reasons mentioned in the reading passage. In fact, the professor believes that these reasons won't lead to satisfaction consequences at all.
First of all, the author suggests that after a devastating fire, forests are choked with dead trees. If the trees are not removed, no new trees can grow in the cramped spaces. This argument is challenged by the lecture. The professor says that removing dead trees is not good for the health of forest because it deprives it of the nutrients necessary for future tree growth.
Secondly, the writer contends that dead trees do more than just take up space. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that some insects and birds that inhabit dead trees are beneficial for tree growth.
Finally, it is stated in the article that salvage logging has economic benefits. Many industries depend upon the forests for their production, and because of this, a fire can have a very harmful effect on the economy. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the argues against salvage logging because the dead trees can only be salvaged at a very high cost.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04390243902 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54975941056 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6176290098 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1666666667 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468702543307 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153680367711 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907777044163 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260484231393 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117720009905 0.0443174109184 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.