TPO 14 Q1

Essay topics:

TPO 14 Q1

The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to why salvage logging is beneficial for both of damaged forest and economy and provides three reasons of support, however, the professor explains that this advantages that stated in the passage for salvage logging are questionable and opposes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading passage discusses that this plan salvages the forest from choking with dead trees. In contrast, the professor provides information that this claim cannot be true. He states that the dead trees can increase the fertility of forest soils that consequently help to the growth of trees. He says these reminders include nutrient materials that benefit the forest. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that dead trees are the food resources for insects that are harmful to the forest. With salvage logging contribute to the health of forest with decrease the insects. However, the classroom discussion disagrees with this opinion. According to the professor, in one of the forests in Canada, in spite of the existence of many insects, there isn’t any report related to the harmful effects of insects. Furthermore, these dead trees can useful for birds that are part of the ecosystem too. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in reading unsubstantiated.
Finally, the reading posits that logging with providing much woods for industrials assist to the improvement of economic condition. Also for logging, they need workers that create more job for the community. The professor refutes this point by explaining that these job’s opportunities are contemporary and will not effective in reducing of a rate of unemployment. In fact, the advantages of logging would be small and unimportant.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ding posits that logging with providing much woods for industrials assist to the imp...
^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the improvement of economic condition. Also for logging, they need workers that cre...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, so, in contrast, in fact, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40206185567 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85754070922 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54295532646 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.2859517605 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406296334176 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122716813683 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876997467133 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241168641626 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325491527862 0.0443174109184 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.