Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, people change generation to generation. In the previous generations, participating in activities that help their society was a moral value and most people tend to involve in these kinds of activities but a new generation has a different viewpoint. Definitely, some people if asked would agree with the statement that young people do not care about helping their society while others have a negative attitude. As I am concerned, I completely agree with the first idea. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on arguments for supporting my view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that nowadays, youngsters are really materialistic and money oriented. The most important concern for them is to possess the luxurious things in order to be the best among their peers. For them, it is not important how they can assist their community that they live there. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. I attend a painting class for spending my leisure time, in this class, there is a great verity of ages, I was so astonished about how my younger classmates often time talk about their possessions, which one has the latest car model, house, or expensive accessories. Surely, these people could not dedicate a part of their time and money for the improvement of their society.
Another reason that deserves some words is that the new generation is somewhat selfish. They want government provides the best services without asking them to be responsible for their world around them. For instance, in my hometown every spring the government hold a charity to collect some money, cloth, books and other staff for an indigent family. But a lot of people that donate some aides are older people. Youngsters usually not take part in these services. They prefer to take their thing for their own selves because they think they might be useful in the future although they do not need those things.
By the way of conclusion, base on the arguments explored above I am of the opinion that due to the new generation is really materialistic and selfish, do not give enough time to helping their communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | farzanehHLM667 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Somayya | 71 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | marysv | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mohammadkmi | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | Amirabbas | 68 | view |
- TPO 8 – Task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the statement?Television advertising directed toward young children ( aged two to five) should not be allowed 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- TPO 14 Q1 80
- TPO6 Q1Integrated TOEFL writing 3
- TPO25: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, so, while, for instance, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96952908587 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71142039419 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567867036011 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.389311765 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228900623944 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655469598375 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690914542136 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154418134324 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717476791329 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.