TPO 15
The lecturer completely refuets the reading passage. The speakers uses three points to indicate that non of the solutions which are given in the article is effective to stop the spread of cane toad in Australia.
First, althogh a fence was successful to stop rabbits spread back on the begining of twentieth century, the fence would not stop cane toads from spreading. This is because young toad and eggs usually found in rivers stream and they could cross the fence to new areas and establish new habbitates. This facts shows that building a national fence would unlikely stop cane toads spreading.
Second, even thogh cane toads can be easily captured and destroyed by volunteers, other species might be destroyed as well. The professors mentions that there are many endangered frog species live alongside with cane toads and they look similart to each others. Thus, untrained volunteers might hunt and destroy young frog instead of cane toads. This would cause other unwanted problem to the environment.
Finally, it is true that researchers have developed virus that targets cane toads reproductive system, but it will infect other reptiles that usually get transfered to Central and South America. These repltiles will transmit the virus to the cane toads in both Americas where native cane toads live. This soultion is not parctical because it will destroy one of important species in Americas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'use'.
Suggestion: use
...fuets the reading passage. The speakers uses three points to indicate that non of th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...new areas and establish new habbitates. This facts shows that building a national fe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...nd establish new habbitates. This facts shows that building a national fence would un...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...ht be destroyed as well. The professors mentions that there are many endangered frog sp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mentions that there are many endangered frog species live alongside with cane to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, second, so, thus, well, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22368421053 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45668853532 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600877192982 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1895179492 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.547496332455 0.272083759551 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187452161857 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111974122279 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301768535606 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819567181411 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.