TPO 15
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage.
To stop spread of cane toad in Australia
The listening and the reading materials have a doubt on ways that may prevent increasing the population of toad in Australia. The penman puts 3 main hypotheses, which refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer proposes that making national fence limiting toads from spreading into other parts of country, will solve the problem. because in similar experiment about rabbits, it had been useful strategy. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, not only this proposal is not efficient, but it also does not stop juvenile toads and eggs existing in rivers from spreading of one side to other side.
The second point offered by the author is that volunteers can help government for collecting toads and their children and eggs even easier. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that they are untrained and may damage to native toads by destroying Australia's ecosystem.
Last, the reading passage suggests that injecting some kind of disease- producing virus can control their population. However, the lecturer holds a different view. She explains that this contaminated animals may send to other countries and an systematically disaster happens.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text according to the above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...rts of country, will solve the problem. because in similar experiment about rabbits, it...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...animals may send to other countries and an systematically disaster happens. ...
^^
Line 13, column 241, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('systematically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('disaster') instead of another adjective.
...animals may send to other countries and an systematically disaster happens. In all, the ideas mentio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, kind of, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25570776256 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63218939454 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657534246575 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9096147288 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9166666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290950473596 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858246276662 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788516355347 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127899609078 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918031314537 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.