tpo42
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.
glass and birds injuries
The reading and the listening passages have a doubt on effective ways done on glass for preventing birds damages. The writer puts forward 3 main hypothesis which refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that using one-way glass instead of usual ones provides situation which the birds can not see inside the homes but people can easily observe out side. As a result, they will be safe from hinting to them. However, the speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to him, one-way glass reflexes light like a mirror and the birds thinks that it is sky or tree. Thus, it is more common that bird fly toward the one-way glass and hint with it.
The second point offered by the writer is that applying colorful designs for glasses hinders birds for passing through them; but let the people to see the other side of window. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that the birds may want fly through the designs and size of these pictures must be small enough to prevent them from choosing this work. by decreasing size of designs, seeing out is harder for people.
Last, the writer opposes magnetic field technique in glass for inheriting birds for to them. On the other hand, the speaker holds an opposite view. He explains that birds use magnetic field for far distances and for short ones inside towns and cities they use from their eyes for navigating. Therefore, this proposal is not benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...damages. The writer puts forward 3 main hypothesis which refuted by following speaker. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...the homes but people can easily observe out side. As a result, they will be safe from hi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...o prevent them from choosing this work. by decreasing size of designs, seeing out ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, therefore, thus, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8253968254 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17921825191 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59126984127 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4347218545 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8571428571 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44114671803 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141316851361 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976004984803 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257554786709 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736502170415 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.