Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage.
The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about ways of stopping the spread of the cane toad in Australia. The reading passage refers to three ways to prevent the spread of this animal. On the other hand, the speaker in the listening disagrees with them and she believes that they are not effective ways.
First of all, in the reading, the writer explains that if a national fence builds, it can help to prevent the cone toad from moving into other places. By contrast, the lecturer casts doubt that this way cannot be useful. Because the young toad can pass across this fence and river can carry them to the other places so that establish this fence is not helpful.
Second, the author in the reading passage points out to this view that volunteers have an important role to capture and destroy them. Because they are captured easily by volunteers. In contrast, the speaker holds an opposite view. She believes that these volunteers cannot do it easily because they do not enough ability to recognize the cane toad from other endanger frogs.
As a final point, according to the reading passage, researchers can use a disease-causing virus to control of this animal. On the contrary, the professor makes it clear that it will have dangerous effects on other environments. She said that if researchers transport the infected animals to the America, it makes a lot of problems to their nature. Because this virus can spread to the whole ecosystem and the native cane toad will suffer from this virus.
To sum up, the reading explains three solutions to prevent the spread this animal to other places. However, the professor views this issue from a different angle and she disagrees with these ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rtant role to capture and destroy them. Because they are captured easily by volunteers....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87457627119 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4403012892 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484745762712 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9459584397 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.875 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111796986836 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428975286649 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461974535921 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649518653693 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101562711993 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.