TPO 16
The lecture and the passage are both about the archeological studies and their situation in the United Kingdom which seems to have a great historic background. The writer mentions remarkable limitations restricting the archeological studies. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and provides three main reasons vindicating her viewpoints.
First of all, the author of the assignment believes that many noticeable artifacts had been being lost owing to constructions and their hazards for archeological sites. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions new legislation and guideline which improves this situation by imposing the constructors to . According to this guideline, the constructors have to examine and preserve the site for archeological studies.
Secondly, the article writer claims that inadequate financial support provided for archeological studies would be assumed as an important limitation. Again the lecturer refers to the new guideline which indicates the costs of new studies in new sites of constructions should be paid by the constructors. This new legislation means a raise in financial supports for archeological studies.
Last but not least, the writer feels that archeology careers are limited to specific academic areas with restricted positions; which means many possible archeological investigations might have left without any professional archeologist. The lecturer states her opposition with new possible works which provides by the recent guideline. According to this guideline, many archeological studies should be funded by the constructors. She also notices the statistic data which supports her position. the data shows an increase in the number of occupations within the realm of archeology in the UK.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ituation by imposing the constructors to . According to this guideline, the constr...
^^
Line 13, column 496, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...istic data which supports her position. the data shows an increase in the number of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82239382239 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20126408095 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1364419749 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164636893191 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628924204733 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395364313033 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109394650362 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417921569074 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.