TPO-16
The reading and the lecture both are about "archaeologist". the author of the reading believes in last decades of 1990 the science of archaeology was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain and career opportunities in archaeology. The lecturer challenges the statements made the author. The professor explained three aspects of the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom, each of which has successfully addressed the problems mentioned in the reading passage.
First of all, the author suggests that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. This argument is challenged by the lecture. The professor says any construction project must undergo an evaluation process in order for the archaeological value of the site to be ascertained and a panel of experts is convened to draw up a preservation plan.
Secondly, the writer contends that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that the converted the responsibility for funding archaeological work from the government to construction companies.
Finally, it is stated in the article that it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that she thanks to the new guidelines, many skillful, full-time archaeological experts and professionals are now needed to handle work at various stages of the archaeological investigation, research, and preservation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reading and the lecture both are about 'archaeologist'. the author of...
^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...h are about 'archaeologist'. the author of the reading believes in last ...
^^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blems mentioned in the reading passage. First of all, the author suggests that m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72321428571 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64468397821 2.5805825403 141% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4536127282 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376962482839 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11923046798 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087431963696 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210027728346 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645100042648 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.