tpo 17 growth population consequences on the number of birds
The material discusses certain consequences of the human population growth on the number of birds. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges the points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author mentions that increasing the human population will reduce birds' natural habitats. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and states that expanding urbanization could be bad for some birds' types, but it could be better for other species. The lecturer explains that increasing the human population could increase the number of some birds, such as peogions and therefore, the number of hawks and falcons would increase. The speaker adds that there is no uniform story of declining, some types will shrink; however, other types will grow.
Second, the writer points out that the human population growth could increase agriculture and diminish wilderness areas. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and posits that in the US, less and less lands are used every year. The professor explains that there is an introduction of new more productive crops, which could produce more foods per unit of land, so it would not affect the wilderness areas.
Third, the reading states that humans use chemical pesticides to cultivate crops, which harm birds and decline their populations. Conversely, the lecturer contradicts this and mentions that humans became more aware of the bad consequences of pesticides, so they follow two strategies. The professor contends that first, they use less toxic pesticides. Second, they grow more pests resistant crops. The speaker explains that these crops will not attract pests, so these crops would not harm birds at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...his and posits that in the US, less and less lands are used every year. The professo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, third, while, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30627306273 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56127372454 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527675276753 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2073615714 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330164806828 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109425387825 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743309878492 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171574730022 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820554361262 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.