TPO 19Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passaBuzzing

Essay topics:

TPO 19

Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passa

Buzzing

The listening and the reading materials have a debate on "buzzing"as a way that companies select for more selling through hiring people for advertising their products privately. The penman puts forward 3 main hypotheses about disadvantages of this technique, which are refuted by following orator.

First of all, the writer suggests that people should be aware that this certain person is payed to support a certain kind of product and his or her description of its benefits may be only because of money. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, buzzers just tell the truth, and it is not advisable that people have suspect about them.

The second point offered by the author is that not being obvious that the buzzers are advertising a product, people may not asking them professional questions. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this assumption by saying that people ask a lot of questions about a certain product from him. As a result, the opposite view of writer's concern is correct.

Last, the reading passage proposes that if people found that ordinary individuals may be buzzers, they will not trust on all people. Thus, this perspective has an extremely detrimental effect on social relation among them. However, the man holds a different view. He explains that this view of point is stupid. If a certain product be bad, its company will not hire a buzzer and spend money on it.

In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text according to above reasons.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98863636364 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.722130569 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5859747126 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0714285714 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282799433985 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810360106749 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687094372437 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136319798697 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06681291086 0.0443174109184 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.