TPO 21
The lecture and the reading passage discuss genetically modified trees which used some process to change an organisms trees. Although the passage claims some positive aspect of this theory, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading points out that genetically modified trees have more resistance than local trees; hence, they can live longer than other trees. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that genetically modified trees are resistance for a particular situation, not for all condition. These trees are changed in genetically; therefore, they are uniform than other types of trees. If climate change for the place which genetically modified trees cultivate, all genetically modified trees would die. But, for local trees, some of them may survive in this condition.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states, that genetically modified trees have economic benefits for farmers, the professor argues that genetically modified trees have hidden cost. Base on a low for each time that farmers want to grow these trees, they had to pay some money to a company.
Finally, although the reading passage says that genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees for using their wood, The speaker disagrees by mentioning that genetically modified trees are more aggressively to local trees. They out compact by native trees on the natural resources such as water, soil and sunshine. Hence, they would kill native trees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6350963244 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7423767204 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.525004933607 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22330779916 0.0996497079465 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135919191839 0.0662205650399 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352346257228 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105165427975 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.