TPO 21 - integrated writing
Both reading and listening section presents two opposite perspectives toward the effect of planting the genetically modified trees. While the passage lists the three main benefits of this cultivation, the lecturer claims the contradictory to these benefits and presents some clues to call into the question those benefits mentioned in the reading part.
First of all, the text posits that for the sake of the genetically altered trees' hardness, they survive longer than the natural trees. However, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of the assertation. As she said, this genetical change causes the trees to be resistance to the specific conditions and cannot handle other types of harsh situations. Besides, as they get uninformed by this genetical alteration, their survival reaction to the threatening situation is identical. Therefore, if one of the trees cannot withstand the condition, all changed trees will not. Meanwhile, the nature trees because of their various level of persistence over the various and serious threaten, there is the chance of survival for few trees of each species.
Next, the passage assumed that these modified trees as grow faster can lead to financial profits. On the other hand, the instructor mentioned that this type of trees possesses a hidden cost which nature trees do not have. For instance, there is an extra charge for the cultivation of the genetically modified seeds. Furthermore, according to the established law, for each cycle of harvesting and planting of this type of tree, the farmer should pay an extra fee to the company.
Finally, while the article assumes that the modified trees are beneficial for the wild tree; the audio casts doubt on the validity of this assumption. As the professor discussed, the genetically altered trees grow aggressively among the wild trees. Consequently, they opt the sunlight, water, and nutrition before the ordinary wild trees can access them. Therefore, the modified trees growth processes hinder the other wild trees' growth.
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and 50
- 1.1.The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylate 29
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 40
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 70
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ses hinder the other wild trees growth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31152647975 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72614684704 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0030837565 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481787782806 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163734496586 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741108730944 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282095617002 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103670667302 0.0443174109184 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.