TPO 22
The lecture and the reading discuss Ethanol fuel that produces by plants. Although the passage claims that Ethanol will not reduce CO2 from the atmosphere, and it will not a good alternative for gasoline, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that Ethanol fuel will increase carbon dioxide into the atmosphere; because it uses as fuel and burned so that it releases carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that Ethanol fuel would not increase carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. He explains that for producing Ethanol fuel, we must cultivate some plants such as corn and sugar cane. These plants need co2 for growing; therefore, they absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Hence, Ethanol fuel would not increase global warming
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that Ethanol produces by plants so that it would decrease plants which use to feed farm animals like cow and chicken. However, the professor argues that Ethanol fuel is produced from cellulose. The cellulose produces in parts of plants that not used as food for animals. Hence, the number of food animals will not reduce.
Finally, although the reading passage says that the price of Ethanol fuel will higher than the Gasoline price; thus, people prefer to use gasoline. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that Ethanol fuel will compete with gasoline price. When enough people will buy Ethanol fuel, the producer will product more Ethanol fuel. As a result, the price of Ethanol fuel will decrease by about 5%. He says that recent research showed that three-time greater produce of ethanol will result in a forty per cent drop in its price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... so that it would decrease plants which use to feed farm animals like cow and chick...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15916955017 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3349761968 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501730103806 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9322815433 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540639536648 0.272083759551 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2187626808 0.0996497079465 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796394284939 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34383522587 0.162205337803 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659849208287 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.