TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task
The article states that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the ethanol is a good alternative and refutes each of the reading’s reasons.
First, the reading states that the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve the environmental problems such as global warming.
The professor counters this point by stating ethanol fuel will not add global warming. Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn. Every growing plant absorb carbon dioxide, so the process of growing plants will counteract the release of carbon dioxide.
Second, the article claims that the production of significant amounts of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants that used to feed farm animals. The professor contends this point by saying that we can produce ethanol by using the cell walls called cellulose that are not eaten by animals, so the amount of animals feed will not be reduced.
Third, the reading avers that ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price. The professor opposes this point by saying that the USA government support will not be needed because when people start buying ethanol fuel then, the production will increase which will leads to a drop in its price.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | negar.sh | 45 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | omega93 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | mahan vahab kashi | 42 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | Steven Beckett | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | raniamekhaiel | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08878504673 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45974224396 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4942264605 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496290496553 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223424133776 0.0996497079465 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948540663205 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28271675524 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520651814423 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.