TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task
The article states that building glass is dangerous for birds and provides three solutions that can use to prevent injuries to birds. However, the lecture casts doubt on all the solution made in the article by saying that none of the solution can effectively stop birds from getting injured.
The first solution mentioned in the reading suggests that replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. However, in the listening material, the professor contends that the argument made in the reading by saying that the problem is the birds are on outside and glass is reflected just like a mirror. For example, the glass might reflect the sky, and birds think the glass in the sky.
The second solution in the reading mentions that paint colorful lines or other designs on regular windows glass could be useful. The lecture, conversely, disagrees with this explanation. The professor explains that glass includes an opening in the design then the birds will perceive these are open holes and fly through them. He also mentions that the opening would need to be extremely small, but then, the room would be too dark.
Finally, the author of the reading passage believes that creating an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from the building. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that birds only use Earth's magnetic field when they are travel long distance. For short distance, they use eyes and brightness of light.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s and provides three solutions that can use to prevent injuries to birds. However, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rsely, disagrees with this explanation. The professor explains that glass includes ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03238866397 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3499365188 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554655870445 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7886008456 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.583333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529436521802 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178708977678 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909928926354 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285882019491 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437684066112 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.