tpo 24-1
The passage claims that dinosaurs’ fossils contain remains of actual tissues of this animal. The lecturer does not agree with the ideas brought up by the passage and offers some counterclaims to reject them.
First, the author argues that there are some hollows in the bone which contain a soft substance. This substance can be attributed to remains of blood vessels. Conversely, the lecturer takes the view that usually bacteria colonize the hollows which exist in the bones. These creatures leave some trace of organic substances after leaving their colonization, so the discovered soft substance may be produced by the bacteria lived living in the bones.
Furthermore, the reading highlights the thought that microscopic tests have revealed the presence of reddish spheres in the bones. These spheres contain iron, the material which is essential for transporting oxygen in blood. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that these reddish spheres have been seen in other organisms which do not have blood vessels. This means that these spheres cannot be the remains of blood vessels.
Finally, the author suggests that recent research has shown that there are some amounts of collagen in dinosaur’s fossils. This fibrous protein is one of the main ingredients of a living bone tissue. However, the speaker states that collagen does not last for more than 100 thousand years, so it is impossible for the collagen to survive after 70 million years. In fact this collagen must have come from another recent source, like researchers’ hand.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.308 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72258994342 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3179641439 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7857142857 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3327769649 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116693212685 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625338757083 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173913777656 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481378710589 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.