TPO - 24
The lecturer and the reading passage hold completely opposite view about the discovery made by researchers from fossil remains of Tyrannosaurus.
The lecturer argues the first point, branching channels corresponds to hollows in the bones, can not be true because the soft flexible material inside the bone channel can be something else. Died bacteria can also form hollow spaces which can form channels of blood vessel. Moreover, the hollow space might be the residue of the organic material. The reading passage, however, argues that soft substance may be the remains of actual blood vessels of T. rex.
Regarding the second point, presence of spheres could be the remains of red blood cells, lecturer explains that fossils of primitive animals did not have red blood cells, therefore presence of spheres do not represent remains of red blood cells. Furthermore, they can be just reddish minerals present in the bones.
Finally, lecturer objects the third point - dinosaur leg bone contained collagen. The lecturer points out that collagen can not be found in hundred thousand year old fossils, while the research were performed on 7- million year old fossils. Thus, this point of the research is too improbable. In addition the collagen found might be from the more recent source i.e from the skin of the researcher handling the bone. Nevertheless, the reading passage gives totally opposite view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts out that collagen can not be found in hundred thousand year old fossils, while...
^^
Line 8, column 142, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... out that collagen can not be found in hundred thousand year old fossils, while the re...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...t of the research is too improbable. In addition the collagen found might be from the mo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53433235252 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595555555556 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.7589322388 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388381277387 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12146950115 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912792191018 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208624722325 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848307694466 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.