TPO 37
The reading and the lecture is about the use of turtle excluder device (TED) to protect the endangered sea turtle species. The reading states that TEDs are not that effective for several reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and refuses all the reasons mentioned in the reasons.
The lecturer argues that the first reason, turtles get trapped rarely, is not true because many shrimpers catch thousands of turtle every year. Even though many escape through th eturtle passages, the cost as a whole would not be too high. The reading passage, however, argues that shrimpers would not be able to catch much turtles due to the escape of turtles and this method will cost them too much so it not an effective way to protect the turtles.
Regarding the second reason, shortening the time limit to keep net under water, the lecturer explains that it is impossible to impose time limits for keeping net under. Government can not monitor the time during which shrimpers using nets to capture turtles. The reading passage gives the opposite view.
Finally, the lecturer objects the third reason - not useful for larger species. She points out that lager TEDs can also be made to catch larger turtle species. Once large TEDs are produced this will not be problem. This is in direct contradiction with the claim in the reading passage that larger species will not fit in the TEDs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'trapped'.
Suggestion: rarely trapped
...gues that the first reason, turtles get trapped rarely, is not true because many shrimpers cat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...at shrimpers would not be able to catch much turtles due to the escape of turtles an...
^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...be made to catch larger turtle species. Once large TEDs are produced this will not b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, regarding, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86307053942 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24866298337 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551867219917 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9561258833 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1538461538 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.