In this set of material, the passage and the lecture offer two opposing points of view about the revealed material from the broken T. rex's leg bone. While the passage argues that these material are the remaining of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen, the lecture contradicts this conclusion.
First, the passage asserts that the breaking of the leg bone revealed many small branching channels inside, which are probably related to blood vessels in the bone because they contained a soft, flexible organic substance. The speaker contradicts this conclusion by pointing out that these soft, flexible substance could be bacteria traces organic materials.
In addition, the article argues that microscopic examination of the bone revealed the presence of spheres that could be the remaining of blood cells because they contained iron and were also the same size of blood cells. On the other hand, the lecture declares that 70 million years ago, animals did not have blood cells and the origin of these spheres may be a reddish mineral.
Finally, the author states that scientists performed a test that showed that the bone had collagen that is a protein which is the main component of bone tissue. in contradict to this, the speaker points out the idea that the collagen does not last long, according to this fact, the collagen is not associated with the bone, it might have another origin like from the skin of the researcher handling the bone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...h is the main component of bone tissue. in contradict to this, the speaker points ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, may, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01239669421 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42827933666 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7696774047 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.777777778 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486416098414 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206346500521 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963531951207 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279548917993 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329273158891 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.