Tpo 25 electrical clay jars
According to the reading passage, discovering of the clay jars at 1938 can not related to this fact that they had been used as electric batteries. The professor in the lecture have opposite view in this relation as following essay.
First, the reading passage mentions that not founding electricity conductors like as metal wires near the vessels proves which they had not been used as batteries. However, the professor believes that clay jars have been fund by local people not by experts, as a result, they may did not recognized and overlook them.
Second, the passage says that the copper cylinders that had been located inside the vessels were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts at ancient near city. In contrast, the professor asserts that these similarity can not really prove that their usage are the same. In addition, these cylinders may originally adapted for electrical usage of the vessels.
Third, the reading passage claim that there was no device in ancient time that could use the electrical power; then, electrical vessels have no application for ancient people. In the lecture, the professor says that some magical power that ancient people had had, may be related to electrical batteries which they had been used by them for releasing pain or other medical goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
...vering of the clay jars at 1938 can not related to this fact that they had been used as...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'recognize'
Suggestion: recognize
... experts, as a result, they may did not recognized and overlook them. Second, the passa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this similarity' or 'these similarities'?
Suggestion: this similarity; these similarities
...In contrast, the professor asserts that these similarity can not really prove that their usage a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
... some magical power that ancient people had had, may be related to electrical batteries...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, may, really, second, so, then, third, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07009345794 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4080840718 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9941515967 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454504046068 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181195999204 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110595236032 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266897488568 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516375595379 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.