The reading and lecture both discuss the uses of vessels that found in Iraq. While the reading provides three explanations why these vessels could not be used as electric batteries, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that people did not use these vessels as batteries. This is because they could not find any conductors or any wires near to these jars. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that these vessels had been discovered by people are not archaeologist. Moreover, they may be found another materials near to these vessels, but they are not aware that these materials are important. Furthermore, they might found wires and they ignored it.
In addition, the article mentions that these batteries are similar to other batteries found ar Selecus. Furthermore, people at Seleucia used these vessels for holding scrolls. However, the professor questions this point by explaining that the similarity between the two vessels can not approve anything. Moreover, people maybe later added liquid and wire to the vessels and used it as batteries at Seleucia. So, they used it to produce electricity.
Lastly, the reading states that there is no evidence to support the idea that people used these vessels that found at Iraq as batteries. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by pointing out that people may be firstly used it for one purpose then used it to other purposes. For instance, these batteries produced shock tending sensation. So, it was evidence as invisible power. As a result, people used it to convince others that they have power. Furthermore, they could used it for heeling to relive pain or to relax the muscles. As a result, they might used these batteries for some medical purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...hey have power. Furthermore, they could used it for heeling to relive pain or to rel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, lastly, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12542372881 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60955308592 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481355932203 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5389027304 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5789473684 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267885871047 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105035230888 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389290830339 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185723815817 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240171587661 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.