TPO 26
The article states that zebra mussels migrated from Eastern Europe to North America, and they became a threat for freshwater fishes population over there. The passage provides three reasons to support its statement. The professor explains that they cannot be considered as a threat anymore and refuses each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that zebra mussels spread by ships that move from Europe to America. It mentions that they stick to the bottom of ships or in ballast water of ships. Their professor opposes this point by saying that zebra mussels cannot survive in ocean water, so ships can use is as their ballast water to prevent the spreading of zebra mussels.
Second, the passage states that zebra mussels do not have any predators and they dominate their habitats. In contrast, the professor says that it does not take a long time for birds to find out that there are new foods in their habitats, and birds can eat a lot of them, so zebra mussels can be dominated.
Third, the article mentions that zebra mussels reduce the population of fishes by eating water planktons. The professor says that they may eat Planktons but they are beneficial somehow by producing Nutrients that can be eaten by fishes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...three reasons to support its statement. The professor explains that they cannot be ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32685690118 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7311634154 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484670492199 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19384463728 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105585636741 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288228611382 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777571151184 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.