Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Throughout the history, in all civilized societies, the issue of people's happiness engendered copious controversies among people. Some incline toward the opinion that it is vital for students to make many new friends easily. Some others, however, may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the ability to preserve your friendships is more essential. As far as I am concerned, the skill that help people maintain their old friends is more important. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point is that people can have deep relationship with their friend. when juveniles meet up with strange and new people they can not understand them well because they do not have information about him. On the other hand, old friend are familiar with each others behaviour. Also they have a same interest. For example, after four years study in university I become friends with my dorm mate and now both of us are trying to continue our education abroad. It is and arduous task to achieve it but we motivate each other every weak and it make us feel confidence.
The second significant reason supporting my idea is that people can trust to their old friend. There is a quote that say old friends are the best friends in the world. When a person meets up with a new person he cannot trust him because he does not know anything about him. On the other hands, an old friend are familiar with each other. Hence, they are trustworthy. For instance, when a person have a problem and he do not want that other people find out about his problem, he can trust to his old friend which are trustworthy and since he is loyal, he is not going to tell his secret to other people. Therefore, he is going to feel supported and happy.
to make a long story short, based on the aforementioned argument, old friends are more crucial that new friends since they know each other profoundly and they are loyal and trustworthy. Consequently, it is highly recommended that, people keep their touch with their old friend which valued a lot. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ve deep relationship with their friend. when juveniles meet up with strange and new ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...hand, old friend are familiar with each others behaviour. Also they have a same intere...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...re familiar with each others behaviour. Also they have a same interest. For example,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...e motivate each other every weak and it make us feel confidence. The second signifi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...ce, when a person have a problem and he do not want that other people find out abo...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... is going to feel supported and happy. to make a long story short, based on the a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75324675325 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58190702505 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522077922078 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2568712577 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1428571429 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245290940173 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704163516086 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451549873696 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158293864022 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475465105037 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.