TPO 27- integrated
As it was stated in the reading passage, the author believed that the Little ice age, which was a period of unusual cold temperature in many parts of the world, happened due to some reasons. On the contrary the lecturer finds the reasons out of date and unpersuasive and repudiates them all by providing some counter arguments.
Initially, the author brought up the idea that disruption of ocean currents could have been the reason of the ice age. However, the lecturer is thoroughly doubtful about the reliability of this idea as he points out that the Gulf Stream would have affect the Europe and North America. But the temperature decline happened in southern hemisphere as well. So the Gulf Stream and ocean current cannot account for the ice age.
Another emphasized point in the reading was that the volcanic eruption could have caused the Little ice age. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this one too by asserting that a large enough eruption might cause a large dust cloud that can prevent sunlight and lower the temperature. But this kind of large eruption would have a visual effect, like gray snow, but there are no reports of such visual anomalies. So the volcanic eruption could not have been large enough to produce huge clouds.
As the last point, the author drew attention to the fact that substantial decreases in human population may lead to less cutting of forest trees and thus cause a temperature decline. Yet again, the lecturer considers this idea invalid as well by stating that the decrease in human population happened for a short period of time and the population grew back in no time and the forests were cut down again for attaining lands. So there was not enough time for forests to become so large to affect the climate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n human population happened for a short period of time and the population grew back in no time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, thus, well, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42260251717 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52131147541 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.895548258 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427504433287 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146702200489 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980019145989 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235061603846 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473084837055 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.