TPO 24- integrated
As it was stated on the reading passage, it is the author's belief that a T-rex's broken leg fossil revealed some materials that seem to be the remains of blood vessels, red blood cells and collagen matrix. He provided three reasons to substantiate his claim. On the contrary, the lecturer finds the justification of the author unpersuasive and repudiates the reasons by some counter arguments.
Initially, the writer brought up the idea that the soft substance, which was found inside the channels of the leg, may represent the remains of blood vessels of T-rex. However, the lecturer is thoroughly doubtful about the reliability of this idea. As he points out that these channels are more likely to be the hollows that were created by bacteries. and the soft substance can be residues of them.
Another emphasized point in the reading was that the examination of the various parts of the inner bone revealed some spheres that could be the remains of red blood cells. On the other hand the lecturer refutes this one too by asserting that scientist have found fossils of primitive animals in the same area that contained these red spheres as well. But we know that primitive animals didn't have red blood cells. So these spheres are not necessarily the remains of red blood cells and their origin might have been some red mineral.
As the last point, the author drew attention to the fact that the dinosaur bone contained collagen, which is a main component of living bone tissue. Yet again, the lecturer considers this idea invalid by explaining that this collagen doesn't necessarily come from T-rex. Human skin contains collagen and touching of the bone by humans might have been the origin of the component.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...tated on the reading passage, it is the authors belief that a T-rexs broken leg fossil ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ful about the reliability of this idea. As he points out that these channels are m...
^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...hollows that were created by bacteries. and the soft substance can be residues of t...
^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ell. But we know that primitive animals didnt have red blood cells. So these spheres ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nvalid by explaining that this collagen doesnt necessarily come from T-rex. Human skin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90689655172 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50156906765 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5021481791 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471626333366 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144035109372 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105114832086 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253614593038 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583676768067 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.