Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views.
Nowadays, despite the many disparities people have in a wide array of areas so far as one's opinion goes, one point that everybody agrees upon is the importance of being aware of news. This is owing to the fact that news contributes to our daily activities and future decisions. That being said, even in this regard, different opinions might stir heated debates as to how we should opt betweed various news agencies. One particularly reoccuring idea brought up is that it is crucial to rely on news presented by different views. I personally find myself sympthatic with this notion. In what follaws, the rationale for this thesis will be elaborated by focusing on 2 reasons.
First anf foremost, it is esier to verfy the authenticity of pieces of news when one collect the news among different sources. The news agencies are usually biased and rarely do they interpret an evident independently. Thus, in almost all the cases, either intentionally or unintentionally, they would mislead the audience by exagerating some special aspects of a news. An example of what happend in Iran could aptly shed light on my claim. There are two major political parties in Iran: Remormists and Conservatives. More than 90% of news agencies such as news papars, magazines, TV Channels, and news websites are financed by either conservatives or reformists. Last week, there were a rumor that the brother of reformist president is accused to economical corruption. All the conservative agensis posted articles and interviews that to prove his accusition while all the remormists were presenting documents to decline the claim. Having read the consevative's one reaches to the conclusion that president's brother is corrupt while by depending on the reformist's s/he would repudiate claim. Then, In my opinion, only by relying on both sides which provide opposite points of views one could possibily hold an unbiased idea about what really happened.
Another equally important reason which deserves some words here is the fact that reading different views would enhance our information. Never does an agency could cover all the different aspects of a news. In today's sophisticated word, hardly could an event be explained based on one view. As a result, numerous experts should consider and a news from different aspects and reveal their analysises to give us some insights about the real cause and possible outcomes of an event.By taking Global Warming as an instance I could aptly substantiate my point. Global Warming is of the heated issues that have become a mater of consideration for a wide variety of experts e.g. sociology, law, ethics, politics, and econimics to name but a few. Each of them might bring up a fact from their own perspective. For instance, a Law expert might consider international law treaties for controlling the problem, a development scientist might think that enforcing restrictive rules to control global warming could decrease the rate of industrilization, and so on. Thus, if one only folows the news from an agency whose experts are more inclined to consider legal aspects, s/he would neglect the other possible consideration. Otherwise, by searching through different sources their information would increase.
to recapitulate, all the reasons presented above bring us to the conclusion that it is better to read or watch news which are presented by different views. This is due to reasons given, which are verification of news and enhancing one's information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...have in a wide array of areas so far as ones opinion goes, one point that everybody ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... opt betweed various news agencies. One particularly reoccuring idea brought up is that it is crucial t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
... by exagerating some special aspects of a news. An example of what happend in Iran cou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 998, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'presidents'' or 'president's'?
Suggestion: presidents'; president's
...ives one reaches to the conclusion that presidents brother is corrupt while by depending o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ould cover all the different aspects of a news. In todays sophisticated word, hardly c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...t, numerous experts should consider and a news from different aspects and reveal their...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...cause and possible outcomes of an event.By taking Global Warming as an instance I ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...es their information would increase. to recapitulate, all the reasons presented...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... are verification of news and enhancing ones information.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, if, really, so, then, thus, while, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2919.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 563.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18472468917 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91774939795 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 212.727598566 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548845470693 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 918.9 618.680645161 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3707370724 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8518518519 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03703703704 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192095377925 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488839517745 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504090981041 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125534626277 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410714407439 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 86.8835125448 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.