Do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?
It is important to read or watch news presented by
people with different views than people by similar
views.
It has always been a controversial argument about whether people should be informed of the news by similar opinions or different ones. Although some people are the leading proponents of the claim that the news represented by people with the same points of view is more beneficial, I to contrary, repudiate this idea. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, one of the most interesting facets of current discussion which deserves keen contemplation is that watching or listening to the news by people with different ideas broaden our horizons and gives us a deep understanding of the news. To elucidate on, people are getting more clung to be informed about the news in their routine lives all around the world. The number of news agencies and channels has dramatically increased specifically over the last decade with the advent of the internet. Although it may seem confusing to listen to a diversity of ideas and points of view, when people are exposed to a variety of opinions by these channels, they are more likely to think more deeply and evaluate the situation more profoundly because they are prompted to review the ideas. Additionally, using this approach gives freedom to people to reach the conclusion by themselves rather than being guided.
Moreover, another noteworthy facet of ongoing discussion which demands to be reflected is that different ideas attract more viewers and have a positive impact on the channel's reputation. It is crystal clear that the news industry like any other one demands to be financially successful. So, in this competitive market agencies and broadcasting channels need to practice new and alternative approaches which one of them is presenting the news with considering different aspects of the condition rather than having one specific opinion. To pave the way, let me give you an example. According to a yet reputable study conducted by researchers at Sharif University of technology, channels and news agencies presenting the news with different ideas have 38% more viewers than the other ones. Furthermore, it can provide a situation for viewers to discuss and argue about the news and as a result, it becomes more fun and amusing.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments lead us to the fact that pros of watching and listening to the news with people with different ideas outweigh its cons owing to the fact that it broadens people's horizons and channels are much more financially benefitted and last but not least, it is more interesting for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to keen'
Suggestion: to keen
...ts of current discussion which deserves keen contemplation is that watching or liste...
^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'channels'' or 'channel's'?
Suggestion: channels'; channel's
...ewers and have a positive impact on the channels reputation. It is crystal clear that th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, it is more interesting for people.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03686635945 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82434723236 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509216589862 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7386978157 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.733333333 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9333333333 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300368887173 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102366301012 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745327112773 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200417899741 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345973350149 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.