Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views.
In this modern day and age, thanks to the recent advancements in the information of technology and more specifically, the internet, we are just a few clicks away from access to a wide variety of news sources. A controversial question that may arise is whether individuals should get the news from people with different points of view or not. Though there is no definite answer to this question, I utterly subscribe to this idea that perhaps a moderate approach, a combination of both extremes, works the best. To discuss this, there are several perspectives, two of dominant which, are explained in detail in the following.
First and foremost, getting the news from resources whose points of view are the same as yours does not necessarily mean that you are getting the wrong information. It is possible that the source(s) that you get your information from might be moral and honest. When it gets to the news, the most important and decisive factor in rating that particular source is not their consensus or conflict with your perspectives but rather is their morality and honesty. To put it differently, the more honest a media is, the more likely it is to provide you with the most accurate and unmanipulated information. In addition, often times people like to be agreed with and this gives their minds a sense of relief. It has psychological roots and is beyond the scope of this essay but it is worth noting that in order for individuals to cultivate their sense of belonging to a community, they might intentionally expose themselves to people who fundamentally think the same as them and in my opinion, it is absolutely okay.
Furthermore, in order for people to raise their awareness of what is going on in their surroundings, and what are their oppositions' thinking patterns, it is immensely important to get the news from sources that might not view a certain condition like them. It can give them an upper hand, especially if they have connections to particular political parties in terms of reading their minds and ruin their plans. Because no matter how moral a media is, they are humans and are susceptible to making mistakes by letting their personal interests influence the way they present you the news. Recent research conducted at the Sharif University of Technology yields several statistics one of which states that more than thirty-five percent of the news presented by the most reliable source in Iran are inaccurate and misleading. This stresses the importance of hearing the news from opposition media.
To wrap it up, contemplating on what was discussed above, a moderate approach that considers getting the news from both the media that thinks the way you do and the ones that do not hold your viewpoints overall. This is because not only getting the news from the media that one might favor is psychologically beneficial, but also might in fact be true, and because, getting the news from sources individuals don't agree with might raise their awareness and broaden their horizon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
... To put it differently, the more honest a media is, the more likely it is to provide yo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...heir plans. Because no matter how moral a media is, they are humans and are susceptible...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tting the news from sources individuals dont agree with might raise their awareness ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in addition, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9311023622 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82263078696 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496062992126 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.842203828 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.352941176 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8823529412 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215192618996 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744674332309 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597343390932 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134561957358 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263736209079 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.